Correlation Between Under Armour and Procter Gamble

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Under Armour and Procter Gamble at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Under Armour and Procter Gamble into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Under Armour and Procter Gamble, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Under Armour and Procter Gamble and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Under Armour with a short position of Procter Gamble. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Under Armour and Procter Gamble.

Diversification Opportunities for Under Armour and Procter Gamble

0.66
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Under and Procter is 0.66. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Under Armour Inc and Procter Gamble in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Procter Gamble and Under Armour is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Under Armour are associated (or correlated) with Procter Gamble. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Procter Gamble has no effect on the direction of Under Armour i.e., Under Armour and Procter Gamble go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Under Armour and Procter Gamble

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon Under Armour is expected to under-perform the Procter Gamble. In addition to that, Under Armour is 2.19 times more volatile than Procter Gamble. It trades about -0.08 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Procter Gamble is currently generating about -0.03 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  14,001  in Procter Gamble on June 28, 2022 and sell it today you would lose (458.00)  from holding Procter Gamble or give up 3.27% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Under Armour Inc  vs.  Procter Gamble

 Performance (%) 
       Timeline  
Under Armour 
Under Performance
0 of 100
Over the last 90 days Under Armour has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite weak performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain somewhat strong which may send shares a bit higher in October 2022. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long term up-swing for the company investors.

Under Price Channel

Procter Gamble 
Procter Performance
0 of 100
Over the last 90 days Procter Gamble has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of rather sound technical and fundamental indicators, Procter Gamble is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price tumult, may contribute to shorter-term losses for the shareholders.

Procter Price Channel

Under Armour and Procter Gamble Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Under Armour and Procter Gamble

The main advantage of trading using opposite Under Armour and Procter Gamble positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Under Armour position performs unexpectedly, Procter Gamble can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Procter Gamble will offset losses from the drop in Procter Gamble's long position.
Under Armour vs. Kibush Capital Corp
The idea behind Under Armour and Procter Gamble pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Procter Gamble vs. Kibush Capital Corp
Check out your portfolio center. Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try Aroon Oscillator module to analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios.

Other Complementary Tools

Probability Of Bankruptcy
Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years
Go
ETF Directory
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world
Go
Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets
Go
Pattern Recognition
Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges
Go
Sync Your Broker
Sync your existing holdings, watchlists, positions or portfolios from thousands of online brokerage services, banks, investment account aggregators and robo-advisors.
Go
Volatility Analysis
Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data
Go
Idea Optimizer
Use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio
Go