Correlation Between Procter Gamble and Philip Morris

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Procter Gamble and Philip Morris at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Procter Gamble and Philip Morris into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Procter Gamble and Philip Morris International, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Procter Gamble and Philip Morris and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Procter Gamble with a short position of Philip Morris. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Procter Gamble and Philip Morris.

Diversification Opportunities for Procter Gamble and Philip Morris

0.24
  Correlation Coefficient

Modest diversification

The 3 months correlation between Procter and Philip is 0.24. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Procter Gamble and Philip Morris International in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Philip Morris Intern and Procter Gamble is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Procter Gamble are associated (or correlated) with Philip Morris. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Philip Morris Intern has no effect on the direction of Procter Gamble i.e., Procter Gamble and Philip Morris go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Procter Gamble and Philip Morris

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon Procter Gamble is expected to generate 74.1 times less return on investment than Philip Morris. In addition to that, Procter Gamble is 1.16 times more volatile than Philip Morris International. It trades about 0.0 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Philip Morris International is currently generating about 0.15 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  9,323  in Philip Morris International on May 10, 2022 and sell it today you would earn a total of  437.00  from holding Philip Morris International or generate 4.69% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Procter Gamble  vs.  Philip Morris International

 Performance (%) 
       Timeline  
Procter Gamble 
Procter Performance
0 of 100
Over the last 90 days Procter Gamble has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of rather sound technical and fundamental indicators, Procter Gamble is not utilizing all of its potentials. The new stock price tumult, may contribute to shorter-term losses for the shareholders.

Procter Price Channel

Philip Morris Intern 
Philip Performance
0 of 100
Over the last 90 days Philip Morris International has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Even with relatively steady primary indicators, Philip Morris is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price chaos, may contribute to medium-term losses for the stakeholders.

Philip Price Channel

Procter Gamble and Philip Morris Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Procter Gamble and Philip Morris

The main advantage of trading using opposite Procter Gamble and Philip Morris positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Procter Gamble position performs unexpectedly, Philip Morris can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Philip Morris will offset losses from the drop in Philip Morris' long position.
The idea behind Procter Gamble and Philip Morris International pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center. Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try Shere Portfolio module to track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device.

Other Complementary Tools

Transaction History
View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance
Go
Competition Analyzer
Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities
Go
Idea Analyzer
Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas
Go
Money Flow Index
Determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators
Go
Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Go
Price Exposure Probability
Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets
Go
Fundamental Analysis
View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements
Go