Correlation Between Penn Entertainment and Procter Gamble

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Penn Entertainment and Procter Gamble at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Penn Entertainment and Procter Gamble into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Penn Entertainment and Procter Gamble, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Penn Entertainment and Procter Gamble and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Penn Entertainment with a short position of Procter Gamble. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Penn Entertainment and Procter Gamble.

Diversification Opportunities for Penn Entertainment and Procter Gamble

0.69
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Penn Entertainment and Procter is 0.69. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Penn Entertainment and Procter Gamble in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Procter Gamble and Penn Entertainment is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Penn Entertainment are associated (or correlated) with Procter Gamble. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Procter Gamble has no effect on the direction of Penn Entertainment i.e., Penn Entertainment and Procter Gamble go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Penn Entertainment and Procter Gamble

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Penn Entertainment is expected to generate 2.33 times more return on investment than Procter Gamble. However, Penn Entertainment is 2.33 times more volatile than Procter Gamble. It trades about -0.05 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Procter Gamble is currently generating about -0.13 per unit of risk. If you would invest  3,231  in Penn Entertainment on July 5, 2022 and sell it today you would lose (421.00)  from holding Penn Entertainment or give up 13.03% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Penn Entertainment  vs.  Procter Gamble

 Performance (%) 
       Timeline  
Penn Entertainment 
Penn Entertainment Performance
0 of 100
Over the last 90 days Penn Entertainment has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite latest conflicting performance, the Stock's basic indicators remain persistent and the latest mess on Wall Street may also be a sign of long-standing gains for the company institutional investors.

Penn Entertainment Price Channel

Procter Gamble 
Procter Performance
0 of 100
Over the last 90 days Procter Gamble has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of latest conflicting performance, the Stock's technical and fundamental indicators remain sound and the latest tumult on Wall Street may also be a sign of longer-term gains for the firm shareholders.

Procter Price Channel

Penn Entertainment and Procter Gamble Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Penn Entertainment and Procter Gamble

The main advantage of trading using opposite Penn Entertainment and Procter Gamble positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Penn Entertainment position performs unexpectedly, Procter Gamble can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Procter Gamble will offset losses from the drop in Procter Gamble's long position.
Penn Entertainment vs. Amazon Inc
The idea behind Penn Entertainment and Procter Gamble pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Procter Gamble vs. Amazon Inc
Check out your portfolio center. Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try Bond Directory module to find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies.

Other Complementary Tools

Global Correlations
Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets
Go
Pair Correlation
Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments
Go
Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Go
Price Exposure Probability
Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets
Go
Companies Directory
Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals
Go
Equity Analysis
Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities
Go
Competition Analyzer
Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities
Go
Portfolio Suggestion
Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios
Go
Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Go
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Go
Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets
Go