Correlation Between Microsoft and Invesco Peak

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Microsoft and Invesco Peak at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Microsoft and Invesco Peak into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Microsoft and Invesco Peak Retirement, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Microsoft and Invesco Peak and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Microsoft with a short position of Invesco Peak. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Microsoft and Invesco Peak.

Diversification Opportunities for Microsoft and Invesco Peak

  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Microsoft and Invesco is 0.54. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Microsoft and Invesco Peak Retirement in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Invesco Peak Retirement and Microsoft is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Microsoft are associated (or correlated) with Invesco Peak. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Invesco Peak Retirement has no effect on the direction of Microsoft i.e., Microsoft and Invesco Peak go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Microsoft and Invesco Peak

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Microsoft is expected to generate 1.75 times more return on investment than Invesco Peak. However, Microsoft is 1.75 times more volatile than Invesco Peak Retirement. It trades about 0.03 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Invesco Peak Retirement is currently generating about 0.01 per unit of risk. If you would invest  21,045  in Microsoft on September 4, 2022 and sell it today you would earn a total of  4,457  from holding Microsoft or generate 21.18% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
ValuesDaily Returns

Microsoft  vs.  Invesco Peak Retirement

 Performance (%) 
Microsoft Performance
1 of 100
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Microsoft are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable technical and fundamental indicators, Microsoft is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.

Microsoft Price Channel

Invesco Peak Retirement 
Invesco Performance
5 of 100
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Invesco Peak Retirement are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Invesco Peak is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Invesco Price Channel

Microsoft and Invesco Peak Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   

Pair Trading with Microsoft and Invesco Peak

The main advantage of trading using opposite Microsoft and Invesco Peak positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Microsoft position performs unexpectedly, Invesco Peak can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Invesco Peak will offset losses from the drop in Invesco Peak's long position.
Microsoft vs. ACI Worldwide
Microsoft vs. Altair Engineering
Microsoft vs. Box Inc
Microsoft vs. Consensus Cloud Solutions
The idea behind Microsoft and Invesco Peak Retirement pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center. Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try Global Correlations module to find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets.

Other Complementary Tools

Money Managers
Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world
Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
Options Analysis
Analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios
Portfolio Diagnostics
Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings
Portfolio Comparator
Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account
Fund Screener
Find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges
Portfolio Suggestion
Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios
Equity Valuation
Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data
Headlines Timeline
Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity