Correlation Between Liquidity Services and AKA Brands

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Liquidity Services and AKA Brands at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Liquidity Services and AKA Brands into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Liquidity Services and AKA Brands Holding, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Liquidity Services and AKA Brands and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Liquidity Services with a short position of AKA Brands. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Liquidity Services and AKA Brands.

Diversification Opportunities for Liquidity Services and AKA Brands

  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Liquidity and AKA Brands is -0.07. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Liquidity Services and AKA Brands Holding in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on AKA Brands Holding and Liquidity Services is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Liquidity Services are associated (or correlated) with AKA Brands. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of AKA Brands Holding has no effect on the direction of Liquidity Services i.e., Liquidity Services and AKA Brands go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Liquidity Services and AKA Brands

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Liquidity Services is expected to generate 0.78 times more return on investment than AKA Brands. However, Liquidity Services is 1.27 times less risky than AKA Brands. It trades about 0.05 of its potential returns per unit of risk. AKA Brands Holding is currently generating about -0.09 per unit of risk. If you would invest  997.00  in Liquidity Services on July 8, 2022 and sell it today you would earn a total of  733.00  from holding Liquidity Services or generate 73.52% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
ValuesDaily Returns

Liquidity Services  vs.  AKA Brands Holding

 Performance (%) 
Liquidity Services 
Liquidity Performance
4 of 100
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Liquidity Services are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively conflicting fundamental indicators, Liquidity Services unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Liquidity Price Channel

AKA Brands Holding 
AKA Brands Performance
0 of 100
Over the last 90 days AKA Brands Holding has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite conflicting performance in the last few months, the Stock's forward-looking signals remain somewhat strong which may send shares a bit higher in November 2022. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long term up-swing for the company investors.

AKA Brands Price Channel

Liquidity Services and AKA Brands Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   

Pair Trading with Liquidity Services and AKA Brands

The main advantage of trading using opposite Liquidity Services and AKA Brands positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Liquidity Services position performs unexpectedly, AKA Brands can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in AKA Brands will offset losses from the drop in AKA Brands' long position.
Liquidity Services vs. Amazon Inc
The idea behind Liquidity Services and AKA Brands Holding pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
AKA Brands vs. Amazon Inc
Check out your portfolio center. Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try Price Ceiling Movement module to calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio File Import
Quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format
Idea Optimizer
Use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio
Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated
Portfolio File Import
Quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format
Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets
Portfolio Diagnostics
Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings