Correlation Between JP Morgan and Conagra Brands

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both JP Morgan and Conagra Brands at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining JP Morgan and Conagra Brands into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between JP Morgan Chase and Conagra Brands, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on JP Morgan and Conagra Brands and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in JP Morgan with a short position of Conagra Brands. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of JP Morgan and Conagra Brands.

Diversification Opportunities for JP Morgan and Conagra Brands

0.47
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between JP Morgan and Conagra is 0.47. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding JP Morgan Chase and Conagra Brands in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Conagra Brands and JP Morgan is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on JP Morgan Chase are associated (or correlated) with Conagra Brands. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Conagra Brands has no effect on the direction of JP Morgan i.e., JP Morgan and Conagra Brands go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between JP Morgan and Conagra Brands

Considering the 90-day investment horizon JP Morgan Chase is expected to under-perform the Conagra Brands. In addition to that, JP Morgan is 1.22 times more volatile than Conagra Brands. It trades about -0.24 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Conagra Brands is currently generating about -0.12 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  3,384  in Conagra Brands on July 5, 2022 and sell it today you would lose (121.00)  from holding Conagra Brands or give up 3.58% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

JP Morgan Chase  vs.  Conagra Brands

 Performance (%) 
       Timeline  
JP Morgan Chase 
JP Morgan Performance
0 of 100
Over the last 90 days JP Morgan Chase has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Even with latest conflicting performance, the Stock's basic indicators remain steady and the new chaos on Wall Street may also be a sign of medium-term gains for the company stakeholders.

JP Morgan Price Channel

Conagra Brands 
Conagra Performance
0 of 100
Over the last 90 days Conagra Brands has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of rather sound basic indicators, Conagra Brands is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price tumult, may contribute to shorter-term losses for the shareholders.

Conagra Price Channel

JP Morgan and Conagra Brands Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with JP Morgan and Conagra Brands

The main advantage of trading using opposite JP Morgan and Conagra Brands positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if JP Morgan position performs unexpectedly, Conagra Brands can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Conagra Brands will offset losses from the drop in Conagra Brands' long position.
JP Morgan vs. Amazon Inc
The idea behind JP Morgan Chase and Conagra Brands pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Conagra Brands vs. Amazon Inc
Check out your portfolio center. Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try Portfolio Comparator module to compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account.

Other Complementary Tools

Idea Optimizer
Use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio
Go
Portfolio Diagnostics
Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings
Go
Options Analysis
Analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios
Go
Bond Directory
Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies
Go
Portfolio Holdings
Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing
Go
Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets
Go
Efficient Frontier
Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market.
Go
Portfolio Manager
State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital
Go
Aroon Oscillator
Analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios
Go
Focused Opportunities
Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences
Go