Correlation Between General Employment and Axcella Health

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both General Employment and Axcella Health at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining General Employment and Axcella Health into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between General Employment Enterprises and Axcella Health, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on General Employment and Axcella Health and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in General Employment with a short position of Axcella Health. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of General Employment and Axcella Health.

Diversification Opportunities for General Employment and Axcella Health

-0.11
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between General and Axcella is -0.11. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding General Employment Enterprises and Axcella Health in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Axcella Health and General Employment is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on General Employment Enterprises are associated (or correlated) with Axcella Health. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Axcella Health has no effect on the direction of General Employment i.e., General Employment and Axcella Health go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between General Employment and Axcella Health

Considering the 90-day investment horizon General Employment Enterprises is expected to generate 0.46 times more return on investment than Axcella Health. However, General Employment Enterprises is 2.16 times less risky than Axcella Health. It trades about 0.09 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Axcella Health is currently generating about -0.03 per unit of risk. If you would invest  42.00  in General Employment Enterprises on August 29, 2022 and sell it today you would earn a total of  35.00  from holding General Employment Enterprises or generate 83.33% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

General Employment Enterprises  vs.  Axcella Health

 Performance (%) 
       Timeline  
General Employment 
General Performance
3 of 100
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in General Employment Enterprises are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat unfluctuating basic indicators, General Employment may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in December 2022.

General Price Channel

Axcella Health 
Axcella Performance
0 of 100
Over the last 90 days Axcella Health has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite conflicting performance in the last few months, the Stock's essential indicators remain somewhat strong which may send shares a bit higher in December 2022. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long term up-swing for the company investors.

Axcella Price Channel

General Employment and Axcella Health Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with General Employment and Axcella Health

The main advantage of trading using opposite General Employment and Axcella Health positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if General Employment position performs unexpectedly, Axcella Health can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Axcella Health will offset losses from the drop in Axcella Health's long position.
General Employment vs. Automatic Data Procs
General Employment vs. Paychex
General Employment vs. Robert Half International
General Employment vs. Kanzhun Ltd ADR
The idea behind General Employment Enterprises and Axcella Health pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Axcella Health vs. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
Axcella Health vs. Vertex Pharmaceutic
Check out your portfolio center. Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try Insider Screener module to find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance.

Other Complementary Tools

Equity Valuation
Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data
Go
Volatility Analysis
Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data
Go
Stock Tickers
Use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites
Go
Stock Tickers
Use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites
Go
Insider Screener
Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance
Go