Karen Katz - Under Armour Independent Director

UA -  USA Stock  

USD 9.93  0.50  4.79%

  Director
Ms. Karen W. Katz is an Independent Director of Under Armour, Inc
Age: 64  Director Since 2014      
410 468 2512  https://www.underarmour.com
Katz has served as President and CEO and a member of the Board of Directors of Neiman Marcus Group LTD LLC since 2010. Neiman Marcus Group is an international multibrand omnichannel retailer whose portfolio of brands includes Neiman Marcus, Bergdorf Goodman and mytheresa.com. Since joining Neiman Marcus in 1985, Ms. Katz has served in key executive and leadership roles in the company’s merchant, stores and eCommerce organizations as Executive Vice President Stores, a member of the Office of the Chairman of Neiman Marcus Group, and President, Neiman Marcus Online, and President and CEO, Neiman Marcus Stores.

Karen Katz Latest Insider Activity

Tracking and analyzing the buying and selling activities of Karen Katz against Under Armour stock is an integral part of due diligence when investing in Under Armour. Karen Katz insider activity provides valuable insight into whether Under Armour is net buyers or sellers over its current business cycle. Note, Under Armour insiders must abide by specific rules, including filing SEC forms every time they buy or sell Under Armour'sshares to prevent insider trading or benefiting illegally from material non-public information that their positions give them access to.

Under Armour Management Efficiency

Under Armour has Return on Asset (ROA) of 6.58 % which means that for every $100 of asset, it generated profit of $6.58. This is typical in the industry. Likewise, it shows return on total equity (ROE) of 19.13 %, which means that it produced $19.13 on every 100 dollars invested by current stockholders. Under Armour management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well the company manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities.
The company reports 1.5 B of total liabilities with total debt to equity ratio (D/E) of 0.72, which is normal for its line of buisiness. Under Armour has a current ratio of 2.25, indicating that it is in good position to pay out its debt commitments in time. Debt can assist Under Armour until it has trouble settling it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. So, Under Armour's shareholders could walk away with nothing if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt. However, a more frequent occurrence is when companies like Under Armour sell additional shares at bargain prices, diluting existing shareholders. Debt, in this case, can be an excellent and much better tool for Under to invest in growth at high rates of return. When we think about Under Armour's use of debt, we should always consider it together with cash and equity.
Is Under Armour's industry expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Under Armour. If investors know Under will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Under Armour listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
The market value of Under Armour is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Under that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Under Armour's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Under Armour's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Under Armour's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Under Armour's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Under Armour's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine Under Armour value by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Under Armour's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.

Similar Executives

Showing few of many executives

DIRECTOR Since

Karl PetersonNorwegian Cruise Ord
2008
Thasunda DuckettNike Inc
2019
Zhequing ShenNu Skin Enterprises
2016
Andrew LipmanNu Skin Enterprises
1999
David AbramsNorwegian Cruise Ord
2014
Robert MironDiscovery Comm A
2014
Mary LandryNorwegian Cruise Ord
2018
John ThompsonNike Inc
2019
Anne SweeneyNetflix
2015
Neil OffenNu Skin Enterprises
2011
Alan GrafNike Inc
2014
Phyllis WiseNike Inc
2014
Jay HoagNetflix
2012
KaKeung YeungThe9 Ltd ADR
2005
Travis KnightNike Inc
2015
Kenneth LoweDiscovery Comm A
2018
Daniel CampbellNu Skin Enterprises
1997
Scott PondNu Skin Enterprises
2018
Kwok ChauThe9 Ltd ADR
2018
Zheqing ShenNu Skin Enterprises
2016
Ann MatherNetflix
2010
Under Armour, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, engages in the developing, marketing, and distributing performance apparel, footwear, and accessories for men, women, and youth. Under Armour, Inc. was incorporated in 1996 and is headquartered in Baltimore, Maryland. Under Armour operates under Apparel Manufacturing classification in the United States and is traded on New York Stock Exchange. Under Armour (UA) is traded on New York Stock Exchange in USA and employs 7,000 people.

Under Armour Leadership Team

Elected by the shareholders, the Under Armour's board of directors comprises two types of representatives: Under Armour inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of Under. The board's role is to monitor Under Armour's management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. Under Armour's inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, Under Armour's outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
Kevin Plank, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer
Tchernavia Rocker, Chief People and Administrative Officer
Anthony Deering, Independent Director
KarlHeinz Maurath, Chief Revenue Officer
David Bergman, Chief Financial Officer
Stephanie Pugliese, President North America
Westley Moore, Independent Director
James Hardy, Chief Supply Chain Officer
Mohamed Erian, Lead Independent Director
Jason LaRose, President - North America
Patrik Frisk, President, Chief Executive Officer, Director
Brad Dickerson, Advisor
Clay Dean, Chief Innovation Officer
William McDermott, Independent Director
Colin Browne, President of Global Sourcing
Kelley McCormick, Senior Vice President - Corporate Communications
Andrew Page, Senior Vice President Principal Accounting Officer
Massimo Baratto, Executive Vice President, Chief Consumer Officer
Terdema Ussery, President Global Sports Categories
Robin Thurston, Chief Digital Officer
Matthew Mirchin, Executive Vice President - Global Marketing
Kip Fulks, Chief Marketing Officer
Mohamed ElErian, Lead Independent Director
Harvey Sanders, Independent Director
Chip Molloy, CFO
Andy Donkin, Chief Marketing Officer
Henry Stafford, Chief Merchandising Officer
Michael Lee, Chief Digital Officer
Alessandro Pestel, Chief Marketing Officer
Paul Fipps, Chief Experience Officer
Alvin Krongard, Lead Independent Director
Eric Olson, Independent Director
Byron Adams, Sr. Advisor to the Chairman and Director
Kasey Jarvis, Chief Design Officer
Kevin Eskridge, Chief Product Officer
Lawrence Molloy, CFO
Kerry Chandler, Chief Human Resource Officer
Jerri DeVard, Independent Director
Douglas Coltharp, Independent Director
John Stanton, Executive Vice President, General Counsel, Corporate Secretary
David Gibbs, Independent Director
Adam Peake, Senior Vice President - Sales, North America
George Bodenheimer, Independent Director
Karen Katz, Independent Director
Lisa Collier, Chief Product Officer

Under Stock Performance Indicators

The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is Under Armour a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.

Be your own money manager

Our tools can tell you how much better you can do entering a position in Under Armour without increasing your portfolio risk or giving up expected return. As an individual investor, you need to find a reliable way to track all your investment portfolios. However, your requirements will often be based on how much of the process you decide to do yourself. In addition to allowing all investors analytical transparency into all their portfolios, our tools can evaluate.risk-adjusted returns of your individual positions relative to your overall portfolio.

Did you try this?

Run Portfolio Manager Now

   

Portfolio Manager

State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital
All  Next Launch Module

Also Currently Popular

Analyzing currently trending equities could be an opportunity to develop a better portfolio based on different market momentums that they can trigger. Utilizing the top trending stocks is also useful when creating a market-neutral strategy or pair trading technique involving a short or a long position in a currently trending equity.
Also, please take a look at World Market Map. Note that the Under Armour information on this page should be used as a complementary analysis to other Under Armour's statistical models used to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try Portfolio Backtesting module to avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios.

Complementary Tools for Under Stock analysis

When running Under Armour price analysis, check to measure Under Armour's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Under Armour is operating at the current time. Most of Under Armour's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Under Armour's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Under Armour's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Under Armour to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
My Watchlist Analysis
Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like
Go
Crypto Correlations
Use cryptocurrency correlation module to diversify your cryptocurrency portfolio across multiple coins
Go
Pair Correlation
Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments
Go
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Go
Fundamentals Comparison
Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities
Go
Is Under Armour's industry expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Under Armour. If investors know Under will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Under Armour listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
The market value of Under Armour is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Under that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Under Armour's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Under Armour's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Under Armour's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Under Armour's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Under Armour's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine Under Armour value by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Under Armour's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.