RESTAURANT BRANDS Current Financial Leverage

RESTAURANT BRANDS's financial leverage is the degree to which the firm utilizes its fixed-income securities and uses equity to finance projects. Companies with high leverage are usually considered to be at financial risk. RESTAURANT BRANDS's financial risk is the risk to RESTAURANT BRANDS stockholders that is caused by an increase in debt. In other words, with a high degree of financial leverage come high-interest payments, which usually reduce Earnings Per Share (EPS).
Check out Your Equity Center.
  
Given that RESTAURANT BRANDS's debt-to-equity ratio measures a company's obligations relative to the value of its net assets, it is usually used by traders to estimate the extent to which RESTAURANT BRANDS is acquiring new debt as a mechanism of leveraging its assets. A high debt-to-equity ratio is generally associated with increased risk, implying that it has been aggressive in financing its growth with debt. Another way to look at debt-to-equity ratios is to compare the overall debt load of RESTAURANT BRANDS to its assets or equity, showing how much of the company assets belong to shareholders vs. creditors. If shareholders own more assets, RESTAURANT BRANDS is said to be less leveraged. If creditors hold a majority of RESTAURANT BRANDS's assets, the company is said to be highly leveraged.

RESTAURANT BRANDS Financial Leverage Rating

RESTAURANT BRANDS INTL bond ratings play a critical role in determining how much RESTAURANT BRANDS have to pay to access credit markets, i.e., the amount of interest on their issued debt. The threshold between investment-grade and speculative-grade ratings has important market implications for RESTAURANT BRANDS's borrowing costs.

RESTAURANT BRANDS INTL Debt to Cash Allocation

As RESTAURANT BRANDS INTL follows its natural business cycle, the capital allocation decisions will not magically go away. RESTAURANT BRANDS's decision-makers have to determine if most of the cash flows will be poured back into or reinvested in the business, reserved for other projects beyond operational needs, or paid back to stakeholders and investors. Many companies eventually find out that there is only so much market out there to be conquered, and adding the next product or service is only half as profitable per unit as their current endeavors. Eventually, the company will reach a point where cash flows are strong, and extra cash is available but not fully utilized. In this case, the company may start buying back its stock from the public or issue more dividends.
The company has accumulated 13.48 B in total debt with debt to equity ratio (D/E) of 340.4, indicating the company may have difficulties to generate enough cash to satisfy its financial obligations. RESTAURANT BRANDS INTL has a current ratio of 1.18, suggesting that it may have difficulties to pay its financial obligations in time and when they become due. Debt can assist RESTAURANT BRANDS until it has trouble settling it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. So, RESTAURANT BRANDS's shareholders could walk away with nothing if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt. However, a more frequent occurrence is when companies like RESTAURANT BRANDS INTL sell additional shares at bargain prices, diluting existing shareholders. Debt, in this case, can be an excellent and much better tool for RESTAURANT to invest in growth at high rates of return. When we think about RESTAURANT BRANDS's use of debt, we should always consider it together with cash and equity.

RESTAURANT BRANDS Assets Financed by Debt

Typically, companies with high debt-to-asset ratios are said to be highly leveraged. The higher the ratio, the greater risk will be associated with the RESTAURANT BRANDS's operation. In addition, a high debt-to-assets ratio may indicate a low borrowing capacity of RESTAURANT BRANDS, which in turn will lower the firm's financial flexibility. Like all other financial ratios, a a RESTAURANT BRANDS debt ratio should be compared their industry average or other competing firms.

Some investors attempt to determine whether the market's mood is bullish or bearish by monitoring changes in market sentiment. Unlike more traditional methods such as technical analysis, investor sentiment usually refers to the aggregate attitude towards RESTAURANT BRANDS in the overall investment community. So, suppose investors can accurately measure the market's sentiment. In that case, they can use it for their benefit. For example, some tools to gauge market sentiment could be utilized using contrarian indexes, RESTAURANT BRANDS's short interest history, or implied volatility extrapolated from RESTAURANT BRANDS options trading.

Currently Active Assets on Macroaxis

Check out Your Equity Center. Note that the RESTAURANT BRANDS INTL information on this page should be used as a complementary analysis to other RESTAURANT BRANDS's statistical models used to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try Competition Analyzer module to analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities.

Other Tools for RESTAURANT Stock

When running RESTAURANT BRANDS INTL price analysis, check to measure RESTAURANT BRANDS's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy RESTAURANT BRANDS is operating at the current time. Most of RESTAURANT BRANDS's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of RESTAURANT BRANDS's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and financial market as a whole to determine factors that move RESTAURANT BRANDS's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of RESTAURANT BRANDS to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
Cryptocurrency Center
Build and monitor diversified portfolio of extremely risky digital assets and cryptocurrency
Go
Fund Screener
Find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges
Go
Commodity Channel Index
Use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum
Go
My Watchlist Analysis
Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like
Go
Probability Of Bankruptcy
Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years
Go
Price Ceiling Movement
Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments
Go
Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope
Go
Portfolio Manager
State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital
Go
Global Correlations
Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets
Go
Portfolio Suggestion
Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios
Go
Portfolio Holdings
Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing
Go

What is Financial Leverage?

Financial leverage is the use of borrowed money (debt) to finance the purchase of assets with the expectation that the income or capital gain from the new asset will exceed the cost of borrowing. In most cases, the debt provider will limit how much risk it is ready to take and indicate a limit on the extent of the leverage it will allow. In the case of asset-backed lending, the financial provider uses the assets as collateral until the borrower repays the loan. In the case of a cash flow loan, the general creditworthiness of the company is used to back the loan. The concept of leverage is common in the business world. It is mostly used to boost the returns on equity capital of a company, especially when the business is unable to increase its operating efficiency and returns on total investment. Because earnings on borrowing are higher than the interest payable on debt, the company's total earnings will increase, ultimately boosting stockholders' profits.

Leverage and Capital Costs

The debt to equity ratio plays a role in the working average cost of capital (WACC). The overall interest on debt represents the break-even point that must be obtained to profitability in a given venture. Thus, WACC is essentially the average interest an organization owes on the capital it has borrowed for leverage. Let's say equity represents 60% of borrowed capital, and debt is 40%. This results in a financial leverage calculation of 40/60, or 0.6667. The organization owes 10% on all equity and 5% on all debt. That means that the weighted average cost of capital is (.4)(5) + (.6)(10) - or 8%. For every $10,000 borrowed, this organization will owe $800 in interest. Profit must be higher than 8% on the project to offset the cost of interest and justify this leverage.

Benefits of Financial Leverage

Leverage provides the following benefits for companies:
  • Leverage is an essential tool a company's management can use to make the best financing and investment decisions.
  • It provides a variety of financing sources by which the firm can achieve its target earnings.
  • Leverage is also an essential technique in investing as it helps companies set a threshold for the expansion of business operations. For example, it can be used to recommend restrictions on business expansion once the projected return on additional investment is lower than the cost of debt.
By borrowing funds, the firm incurs a debt that must be paid. But, this debt is paid in small installments over a relatively long period of time. This frees funds for more immediate use in the stock market. For example, suppose a company can afford a new factory but will be left with negligible free cash. In that case, it may be better to finance the factory and spend the cash on hand on inputs, labor, or even hold a significant portion as a reserve against unforeseen circumstances.

The Risk of Financial Leverage

The most obvious and apparent risk of leverage is that if price changes unexpectedly, the leveraged position can lead to severe losses. For example, imagine a hedge fund seeded by $50 worth of investor money. The hedge fund borrows another $50 and buys an asset worth $100, leading to a leverage ratio of 2:1. For the investor, this is neither good nor bad -- until the asset price changes. If the asset price goes up 10 percent, the investor earns $10 on $50 of capital, a net gain of 20 percent, and is very pleased with the increased gains from the leverage. However, if the asset price crashes unexpectedly, say by 30 percent, the investor loses $30 on $50 of capital, suffering a 60 percent loss. In other words, the effect of leverage is to increase the volatility of returns and increase the effects of a price change on the asset to the bottom line while increasing the chance for profit as well.