Uber Technologies Stock Insiders


USD 32.47  0.23  0.71%   

Uber Technologies employes about 30.9 K people. The company is managed by 24 executives with total tenure of roughly 125 years, averaging almost 5.0 years of service per executive having 1287.5 employees per reported executive. Discussion of Uber Technologies management performance can provide insight into the enterprise performance. Note, employee sentiment is becoming a valuable factor that investors use to determine the amount of risk that may be associated with Uber Technologies future performance.
Also, please take a look at World Market Map.
  Dara Khosrowshahi  CEO
Chief Executive Officer, Director
  Tony West  President
Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary
  Andrew Macdonald  President
Senior Vice President Global Rides

Uber Technologies Management Team Effectiveness

Uber Technologies has return on total asset (ROA) of (5.17) % which means that it has lost $5.17 on every $100 spent on asset. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows return on stockholders equity (ROE) of (53.3) %, meaning that it created substantial loss on money invested by shareholders. Uber Technologies management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well the company manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. As of 08/12/2022, Return on Investment is likely to drop to -18.77. In addition to that, Return on Average Assets is likely to drop to -1.49. Uber Technologies Revenue to Assets are relatively stable at the moment as compared to the past year. Uber Technologies reported last year Revenue to Assets of 0.45. As of 08/12/2022, Total Assets Per Share is likely to grow to 27.10, while Current Assets are likely to drop slightly above 8.7 B.
As of 08/12/2022, Weighted Average Shares is likely to grow to about 2 B. Also, Weighted Average Shares Diluted is likely to grow to about 2 B

Uber Technologies Workforce Comparison

Uber Technologies is rated first in number of employees category among related companies. The total workforce of Software—Application industry is at this time estimated at about 282,724. Uber Technologies retains roughly 30,900 in number of employees claiming about 11% of equities listed under Software—Application industry.

Uber Technologies Profit Margins

The company has Profit Margin (PM) of (29.51) %, which may suggest that it does not properly executes on its current pricing strategies or is unable to control all of the operational costs. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows Operating Margin (OM) of (13.04) %, which suggests for every $100 dollars of sales, it generated a net operating loss of -0.13.

Uber Technologies Insider Trading

Some recent studies suggest that insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers and decreases overall economic growth. Trading by specific Uber Technologies insiders, such as employees or executives, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on Uber Technologies' material information that is not in the public domain. Local jurisdictions usually require such trading to be reported in order to monitor insider transactions. In many U.S. states, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade. In these cases, Uber Technologies insiders must file a Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when buying or selling shares of their own companies.

Uber Technologies Benchmark Summation

The output start index for this execution was zero with a total number of output elements of sixty-one. Uber Technologies Price Series Summation is a cross summation of Uber Technologies price series and its benchmark/peer.

Uber Technologies Notable Stakeholders

An Uber Technologies stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Uber Technologies often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Uber Technologies' stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Uber Technologies' stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
Dara Khosrowshahi - Chief Executive Officer, DirectorProfile
Tony West - Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Corporate SecretaryProfile
Andrew Macdonald - Senior Vice President Global RidesProfile
Jill Hazelbaker - Senior Vice President - Communications and Public PolicyProfile
Nikki Krishnamurthy - Senior Vice President and Chief People OfficerProfile
Nelson Chai - Chief Financial OfficerProfile
Barney Harford - COOProfile
Thuan Phan - CTOProfile
Yasir AlRumayyan - Independent DirectorProfile
John Thain - Independent DirectorProfile
Wan Martello - Independent DirectorProfile
Garrett Camp - Independent DirectorProfile
Ryan Graves - DirectorProfile
Matthew Cohler - Independent DirectorProfile
Arianna Huffington - Independent DirectorProfile
David Trujillo - Independent DirectorProfile
Alexander Wynaendts - Independent DirectorProfile
Amanda Ginsberg - Independent DirectorProfile
Travis Kalanick - DirectorProfile
Ursula Burns - Independent DirectorProfile
Ronald Sugar - Independent Chairperson of the BoardProfile
Robert Eckert - Independent DirectorProfile
Revathi Advaithi - Independent DirectorProfile
Manik Gupta - Chief Product OfficerProfile

About Uber Technologies Management Performance

The success or failure of an entity such as Uber Technologies often depends on how effective the management is. Uber Technologies management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Uber Technologies management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Uber Technologies management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
Please read more on our stock advisor page.
Last ReportedProjected for 2022
Return on Investment(17.39) (18.77) 
Return on Average Assets(1.38) (1.49) 
Return on Average Equity(3.71) (4.01) 
Uber Technologies, Inc. develops and operates proprietary technology applications in the United States, Canada, Latin America, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and the Asia Pacific. Uber Technologies, Inc. was founded in 2009 and is headquartered in San Francisco, California. Uber Technologies operates under SoftwareApplication classification in the United States and is traded on New York Stock Exchange. It employs 30900 people.
The data published in Uber Technologies' official financial statements usually reflect Uber Technologies' business processes, product offerings, services, and other fundamental events. But there are other numbers, ratios, or fundamental indicators derived from these statements that are easier to understand and visualize within the underlying realities that drive quantitative information of Uber Technologies. For example, before you start analyzing numbers published by Uber Technologies accountants, it's critical to develop an understanding of what Uber Technologies' liquidity, profitability, and earnings quality are in the context of the Technology space in which it operates.
Please note, the presentation of Uber Technologies' financial position, as portrayed in its financial statements, is often influenced by management's estimates, judgments, and sometimes even manipulations. In the best case, Uber Technologies' management is honest, while the outside auditors are strict and uncompromising. Whatever the case, the imprecision that can be found in Uber Technologies' accounting process means that the reasonable investor should take a skeptical approach toward the financial statement analysis of Uber Technologies. Please utilize our Beneish M Score to check the likelihood of Uber Technologies' management to manipulate its earnings.

Uber Technologies Workforce Analysis

Traditionally, organizations such as Uber Technologies use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Uber Technologies within its industry.

Uber Technologies Manpower Efficiency

Return on Uber Technologies Manpower

Revenue Per Employee536.2 K
Revenue Per Executive892.1 M
Net Loss Per Employee18.3 K
Net Loss Per Executive263.3 M
Today, most investors in Uber Technologies Stock are looking for potential investment opportunities by analyzing not only static indicators but also various Uber Technologies' growth ratios. Consistent increases or decreases in fundamental ratios usually indicate a possible pattern that can be successfully translated into profits. However, when comparing two companies, knowing each company's per employee growth rates may not be enough to decide which company is a better investment. That's why investors frequently use static breakdown of Uber Technologies per employee as a starting point in their analysis.

Per Employee

Uber Technologies Per Employee Growth Over Time

Net Income Per Employee


Uber Technologies Net Income Per Employee is relatively stable at the moment as compared to the past year. Uber Technologies reported last year Net Income Per Employee of (16,928)

Revenue Per Employee


Uber Technologies Revenue Per Employee is relatively stable at the moment as compared to the past year. Uber Technologies reported last year Revenue Per Employee of 595,734
Also, please take a look at World Market Map. Note that the Uber Technologies information on this page should be used as a complementary analysis to other Uber Technologies' statistical models used to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try Cryptocurrency Center module to build and monitor diversified portfolio of extremely risky digital assets and cryptocurrency.

Complementary Tools for Uber Technologies Stock analysis

When running Uber Technologies price analysis, check to measure Uber Technologies' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Uber Technologies is operating at the current time. Most of Uber Technologies' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Uber Technologies' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Uber Technologies' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Uber Technologies to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Volatility Analysis
Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
Portfolio Suggestion
Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios
Is Uber Technologies' industry expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Uber Technologies. If investors know Uber Technologies will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Uber Technologies listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Market Capitalization
63.8 B
Quarterly Revenue Growth YOY
Return On Assets
Return On Equity
The market value of Uber Technologies is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Uber Technologies that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Uber Technologies' value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Uber Technologies' true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Uber Technologies' market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Uber Technologies' underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Uber Technologies' value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine Uber Technologies value by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Uber Technologies' price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.