Under Stock Executives

UA -  USA Stock  

USD 8.39  0.18  2.19%

Under Armour employes about 7.1 K people. The company is managed by 45 executives with total tenure of roughly 282 years, averaging almost 6.0 years of service per executive having 157.78 employees per reported executive. Analysis of Under Armour management performance can provide insight into the company performance. Note, employee sentiment is becoming a valuable factor that investors use to determine the amount of risk that may be associated with Under Armour future performance.
Also, please take a look at World Market Map.
  Patrik Frisk  CEO
President, Chief Executive Officer, Director
  Kevin Plank  Chairman
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer
  Byron Adams  Chairman
Sr. Advisor to the Chairman and Director

Under Armour Management Team Effectiveness

Under Armour has Return on Asset (ROA) of 6.55 % which means that for every $100 of asset, it generated profit of $6.55. This is typical in the industry. Likewise, it shows return on total equity (ROE) of 19.13 %, which means that it produced $19.13 on every 100 dollars invested by current stockholders. Under Armour management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well the company manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities.

Under Armour Workforce Comparison

Under Armour is rated first in number of employees category among related companies. The total workforce of Apparel Manufacturing industry is at this time estimated at about 397,313. Under Armour claims roughly 7,100 in number of employees contributing just under 2% to stocks in Apparel Manufacturing industry.

Under Armour Profit Margins

The company has Net Profit Margin (PM) of 6.33 %, which may suggest that it has sound control over its expenditures, executes well on its competitive polices, or have a solid pricing strategies. This is very large. Likewise, it shows Net Operating Margin (NOM) of 9.23 %, which signifies that for every $100 of sales, it has a net operating income of 0.09.

Under Armour Benchmark Summation

The output start index for this execution was zero with a total number of output elements of seventeen. Under Armour Price Series Summation is a cross summation of Under Armour price series and its benchmark/peer.

Under Armour Notable Stakeholders

An Under Armour stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Under Armour often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Under Armour's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Under Armour's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
Patrik Frisk - President, Chief Executive Officer, DirectorProfile
Kevin Plank - Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive OfficerProfile
Byron Adams - Sr. Advisor to the Chairman and DirectorProfile
Jason LaRose - President - North AmericaProfile
Colin Browne - President of Global SourcingProfile
Kelley McCormick - Senior Vice President - Corporate CommunicationsProfile
Andrew Page - Senior Vice President Principal Accounting OfficerProfile
Massimo Baratto - Executive Vice President, Chief Consumer OfficerProfile
Terdema Ussery - President Global Sports CategoriesProfile
Matthew Mirchin - Executive Vice President - Global MarketingProfile
John Stanton - Executive Vice President, General Counsel, Corporate SecretaryProfile
Adam Peake - Senior Vice President - Sales, North AmericaProfile
David Bergman - Chief Financial OfficerProfile
Chip Molloy - CFOProfile
Lawrence Molloy - CFOProfile
Anthony Deering - Independent DirectorProfile
Westley Moore - Independent DirectorProfile
William McDermott - Independent DirectorProfile
Mohamed ElErian - Lead Independent DirectorProfile
Harvey Sanders - Independent DirectorProfile
Alvin Krongard - Lead Independent DirectorProfile
Eric Olson - Independent DirectorProfile
Jerri DeVard - Independent DirectorProfile
Douglas Coltharp - Independent DirectorProfile
David Gibbs - Independent DirectorProfile
George Bodenheimer - Independent DirectorProfile
Karen Katz - Independent DirectorProfile
Tchernavia Rocker - Chief People and Administrative OfficerProfile
KarlHeinz Maurath - Chief Revenue OfficerProfile
Stephanie Pugliese - President North AmericaProfile
James Hardy - Chief Supply Chain OfficerProfile
Mohamed Erian - Lead Independent DirectorProfile
Brad Dickerson - AdvisorProfile
Clay Dean - Chief Innovation OfficerProfile
Robin Thurston - Chief Digital OfficerProfile
Kip Fulks - Chief Marketing OfficerProfile
Andy Donkin - Chief Marketing OfficerProfile
Henry Stafford - Chief Merchandising OfficerProfile
Michael Lee - Chief Digital OfficerProfile
Alessandro Pestel - Chief Marketing OfficerProfile
Paul Fipps - Chief Experience OfficerProfile
Kasey Jarvis - Chief Design OfficerProfile
Kevin Eskridge - Chief Product OfficerProfile
Kerry Chandler - Chief Human Resource OfficerProfile
Lisa Collier - Chief Product OfficerProfile

About Under Armour Management Performance

The success or failure of an entity such as Under Armour often depends on how effective the management is. Under Armour management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Under management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Under management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
Please read more on our stock advisor page.
Under Armour, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, engages in the developing, marketing, and distributing performance apparel, footwear, and accessories for men, women, and youth. Under Armour, Inc. was incorporated in 1996 and is headquartered in Baltimore, Maryland. Under Armour operates under Apparel Manufacturing classification in the United States and is traded on New York Stock Exchange. It employs 7100 people.
The data published in Under Armour's official financial statements usually reflect Under Armour's business processes, product offerings, services, and other fundamental events. But there are other numbers, ratios, or fundamental indicators derived from these statements that are easier to understand and visualize within the underlying realities that drive quantitative information of Under Armour. For example, before you start analyzing numbers published by Under accountants, it's critical to develop an understanding of what Under Armour's liquidity, profitability, and earnings quality are in the context of the Consumer Cyclical space in which it operates.
Please note, the presentation of Under Armour's financial position, as portrayed in its financial statements, is often influenced by management's estimates, judgments, and sometimes even manipulations. In the best case, Under Armour's management is honest, while the outside auditors are strict and uncompromising. Whatever the case, the imprecision that can be found in Under Armour's accounting process means that the reasonable investor should take a skeptical approach toward the financial statement analysis of Under Armour. Please utilize our Beneish M Score to check the likelihood of Under Armour's management to manipulate its earnings.

Under Armour Workforce Analysis

Traditionally, organizations such as Under Armour use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Under Armour within its industry.

Under Armour Manpower Efficiency

Return on Under Armour Manpower

Revenue Per Employee800 K
Revenue Per Executive126.2 M
Net Income Per Employee50.7 K
Net Income Per Executive8 M
Working Capital Per Employee143.7 K
Working Capital Per Executive22.7 M
Also, please take a look at World Market Map. Note that the Under Armour information on this page should be used as a complementary analysis to other Under Armour's statistical models used to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try Stock Screener module to find equities using custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook..

Complementary Tools for Under Stock analysis

When running Under Armour price analysis, check to measure Under Armour's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Under Armour is operating at the current time. Most of Under Armour's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Under Armour's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Under Armour's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Under Armour to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
Portfolio Suggestion
Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios
Competition Analyzer
Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities
Global Markets Map
Get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes
Price Ceiling Movement
Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments
Portfolio Backtesting
Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios
Earnings Calls
Check upcoming earnings announcements updated hourly across public exchanges
Portfolio File Import
Quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format
Commodity Channel Index
Use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum
Headlines Timeline
Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity
Risk-Return Analysis
View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume
Pair Correlation
Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments
Is Under Armour's industry expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Under Armour. If investors know Under will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Under Armour listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth YOY
Market Capitalization
Quarterly Revenue Growth YOY
Return On Assets
Return On Equity
The market value of Under Armour is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Under that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Under Armour's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Under Armour's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Under Armour's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Under Armour's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Under Armour's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine Under Armour value by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Under Armour's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.