Hewlett Stock Executives


USD 16.31  0.13  0.80%   

Hewlett Packard employes about 47 people. The company is managed by 47 executives with a total tenure of roughly 195 years, averaging almost 4.0 years of service per executive having 1.0 employees per reported executive. Evaluation of Hewlett Packard management performance can provide insight into the firm performance. Note, employee sentiment is becoming a valuable factor that investors use to determine the amount of risk that may be associated with Hewlett Packard Ente future performance.
Please check Risk vs Return Analysis.
  Margaret Whitman  CEO
CEO and President and Director
  Irving Rothman  CEO
President and Chief Executive Officer of HPE Financial Services (FS)
  Patricia Russo  Chairman
Independent Chairman of the Board

Hewlett Packard Return on Sales


Hewlett Packard Management Team Effectiveness

Hewlett Packard Ente has Return on Asset of 0.0262 % which means that on every $100 spent on asset, it made $0.0262 of profit. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows return on shareholders equity (ROE) of 4.358 %, implying that it generated $4.358 on every 100 dollars invested. Hewlett Packard management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well the company manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. The current year Return on Investment is expected to grow to 4.78. The current year Return on Average Assets is expected to grow to 5.96. Hewlett Packard Current Assets are projected to decrease significantly based on the last few years of reporting. The past year's Current Assets were at 21.71 Billion. The current year Assets Non Current is expected to grow to about 36.1 B, whereas Net Current Assets as percentage of Total Assets are forecasted to decline to (3.71) .
Hewlett Packard Weighted Average Shares Diluted is projected to decrease significantly based on the last few years of reporting. The past year's Weighted Average Shares Diluted was at 1.53 Billion

Hewlett Packard Workforce Comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise is rated below average in number of employees category among related companies. The total workforce of Information Technology industry is currently estimated at about 712,084. Hewlett Packard adds roughly 0.0 in number of employees claiming only tiny portion of equities under Information Technology industry.

Hewlett Packard Profit Margins

The company has Net Profit Margin of 0.03 %, which implies that it may need a different competitive strategy as even a very small decline in it revenue may erase profits and result in a net loss. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows Net Operating Margin of 0.08 %, which entails that for every 100 dollars of revenue, it generated 0.0 of operating income.

Hewlett Packard Insider Trading

Some recent studies suggest that insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers and decreases overall economic growth. Trading by specific Hewlett Packard insiders, such as employees or executives, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on Hewlett Packard's material information that is not in the public domain. Local jurisdictions usually require such trading to be reported in order to monitor insider transactions. In many U.S. states, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade. In these cases, Hewlett Packard insiders must file a Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when buying or selling shares of their own companies.

Hewlett Packard Ente Benchmark Summation

The output start index for this execution was zero with a total number of output elements of sixty-one. Hewlett Packard Ente Price Series Summation is a cross summation of Hewlett Packard price series and its benchmark/peer.

Hewlett Packard Notable Stakeholders

A Hewlett Packard stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Hewlett Packard often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Hewlett Packard's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Hewlett Packard's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
Margaret Whitman - CEO and President and DirectorProfile
Irving Rothman - President and Chief Executive Officer of HPE Financial Services (FS)Profile
Patricia Russo - Independent Chairman of the BoardProfile
Kirt Karros - Senior Vice President - Finance, TreasurerProfile
John Schultz - Executive Vice President, Chief Legal and Administrative Officer, SecretaryProfile
Keerti Melkote - President - Intelligent EdgeProfile
John Hinshaw - Executive Vice President and Chief Customer OfficerProfile
Robert Youngjohns - Executive Vice President and General Manager - HPE SoftwareProfile
Martin Fink - Executive Vice President CTO and Director of Hewlett Packard LabsProfile
Philip Davis - Chief Sales Officer and Presidentident of Hybrid ITProfile
Alan May - Executive Vice President and Chief People OfficerProfile
Jeff Ricci - Senior Vice President, Controller, Principal Accounting OfficerProfile
Henry Gomez - Executive Vice President Chief Marketing and Communications OfficerProfile
Antonio Neri - Executive Vice President and General Manager - Enterprise GroupProfile
Tarek Robbiati - Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice PresidentProfile
Timothy Stonesifer - CFO and Executive VPProfile
Christopher Hsu - COO and Executive VPProfile
Michael Nefkens - Executive VP of Enterprise Services and General Manager of Enterprise ServicesProfile
LipBu Tan - Independent DirectorProfile
Raymond Ozzie - Independent DirectorProfile
Daniel Ammann - Independent DirectorProfile
Mary Wilderotter - Independent DirectorProfile
Raymond Lane - Independent DirectorProfile
Marc Andreessen - Independent DirectorProfile
Pamela Carter - Independent DirectorProfile
Ray Lane - Independent DirectorProfile
Michael Angelakis - Independent DirectorProfile
Leslie Brun - Independent DirectorProfile
Jean Hobby - Independent DirectorProfile
Ann Livermore - Independent DirectorProfile
Gary Reiner - Independent DirectorProfile
Klaus Kleinfeld - Independent DirectorProfile
George Kurtz - Independent DirectorProfile
Philip Mottram - President - Intelligent EdgeProfile
Glenn Leon - Sr OfficerProfile
Justin Hotard - Senior Vice President General Manager - High Performance Computing and Artificial IntelligenceProfile
Neil MacDonald - Senior Vice President General Manager - ComputeProfile
MSc MBA - Ex CFOProfile
Jennifer Temple - Ex OfficerProfile
Peter Ungaro - Senior Vice President General Manager - High Performance Compute and Mission-Critical Systems and Hewlett Packard LabsProfile
Fidelma Russo - Ex CTOProfile
Charles Noski - Independent DirectorProfile
Phil Mottram - President - Intelligent EdgeProfile
Rashmi Kumar - VP OfficerProfile
Andrew Simanek - Head of Investor RelationsProfile
Tom Black - Senior Vice President General Manager - StorageProfile
Thomas Black - Senior Vice President General Manager - StorageProfile

About Hewlett Packard Management Performance

The success or failure of an entity such as Hewlett Packard Ente often depends on how effective the management is. Hewlett Packard management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Hewlett management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Hewlett management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
Last ReportedProjected for 2022
Return on Investment 4.73  4.78 
Return on Average Assets 5.52  5.96 
Return on Average Equity 17.13  18.48 
Return on Invested Capital 0.13  0.14 
Return on Sales 0.17  0.17 
The data published in Hewlett Packard's official financial statements usually reflect Hewlett Packard's business processes, product offerings, services, and other fundamental events. But there are other numbers, ratios, or fundamental indicators derived from these statements that are easier to understand and visualize within the underlying realities that drive quantitative information of Hewlett Packard Ente. For example, before you start analyzing numbers published by Hewlett accountants, it's critical to develop an understanding of what Hewlett Packard's liquidity, profitability, and earnings quality are in the context of the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals space in which it operates.
Please note, the presentation of Hewlett Packard's financial position, as portrayed in its financial statements, is often influenced by management's estimates, judgments, and sometimes even manipulations. In the best case, Hewlett Packard's management is honest, while the outside auditors are strict and uncompromising. Whatever the case, the imprecision that can be found in Hewlett Packard's accounting process means that the reasonable investor should take a skeptical approach toward the financial statement analysis of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. Please utilize our Beneish M Score to check the likelihood of Hewlett Packard's management to manipulate its earnings.

Hewlett Packard Workforce Analysis

Traditionally, organizations such as Hewlett Packard use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Hewlett Packard within its industry.

Hewlett Packard Manpower Efficiency

Return on Hewlett Packard Manpower

Revenue Per Employee377.4 K
Revenue Per Executive606.3 M
Net Income Per Employee55.1 K
Net Income Per Executive18.5 M
Working Capital Per Employee135.9 M
Working Capital Per Executive135.9 M
Today, most investors in Hewlett Packard Stock are looking for potential investment opportunities by analyzing not only static indicators but also various Hewlett Packard's growth ratios. Consistent increases or decreases in fundamental ratios usually indicate a possible pattern that can be successfully translated into profits. However, when comparing two companies, knowing each company's per employee growth rates may not be enough to decide which company is a better investment. That's why investors frequently use static breakdown of Hewlett Packard per employee as a starting point in their analysis.

Per Employee

Hewlett Packard Per Employee Growth Over Time

Net Income Per Employee


Hewlett Packard Net Income Per Employee is projected to increase significantly based on the last few years of reporting. The past year's Net Income Per Employee was at 51,064.2

Revenue Per Employee


Hewlett Packard Revenue Per Employee is projected to increase significantly based on the last few years of reporting. The past year's Revenue Per Employee was at 414,000
Please check Risk vs Return Analysis. You can also try Fund Screener module to find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges.

Complementary Tools for analysis

When running Hewlett Packard Ente price analysis, check to measure Hewlett Packard's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Hewlett Packard is operating at the current time. Most of Hewlett Packard's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Hewlett Packard's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Hewlett Packard's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Hewlett Packard to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
Portfolio Suggestion
Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Price Exposure Probability
Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets
Aroon Oscillator
Analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios
Equity Search
Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets
Sync Your Broker
Sync your existing holdings, watchlists, positions or portfolios from thousands of online brokerage services, banks, investment account aggregators and robo-advisors.
Performance Analysis
Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation
Fund Screener
Find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges
Portfolio Optimization
Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk
Equity Forecasting
Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum
Is Hewlett Packard's industry expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Hewlett Packard. If investors know Hewlett will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Hewlett Packard listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth YOY
Market Capitalization
20.8 B
Quarterly Revenue Growth YOY
Return On Assets
Return On Equity
The market value of Hewlett Packard Ente is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Hewlett that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Hewlett Packard's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Hewlett Packard's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Hewlett Packard's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Hewlett Packard's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Hewlett Packard's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine Hewlett Packard value by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Hewlett Packard's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.