Ford Stock Executives


USD 11.32  0.19  1.71%   

Ford employes about 183 K people. The company is managed by 72 executives with total tenure of roughly 483 years, averaging almost 6.0 years of service per executive having 2541.67 employees per reported executive. Evaluation of Ford management performance can provide insight into the firm performance. Note, employee sentiment is becoming a valuable factor that investors use to determine the amount of risk that may be associated with Ford Motor future performance.
Please check Investing Opportunities.
  Mark Fields  CEO
CEO and President and Director
  James Hackett  CEO
President, Chief Executive Officer, Director
  Joy Falotico  Chairman
Group Vice President – Chairman and CEO, Ford Motor Credit Co.

Ford Return on Sales



Ford Management Team Effectiveness

Ford Motor has return on total asset of 2.27 % which means that for every 100 dollars spent on asset, it generated profit of $2.27. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows return on equity (ROE) of 29.17 %, implying that it made 29.17 on every $100 invested by shareholders. Ford management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well the company manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. Ford Return on Average Assets are projected to slightly decrease based on the last few years of reporting. The past year's Return on Average Assets were at 0.07. The current year Return on Invested Capital is expected to grow to 0.07, whereas Return on Average Equity is forecasted to decline to 0.44. Ford Current Assets are projected to increase significantly based on the last few years of reporting. The past year's Current Assets were at 109 Billion. The current year Assets Non Current is expected to grow to about 158.8 B, whereas Tax Assets are forecasted to decline to about 12.6 B.

Ford Quarterly Total Assets

252.99 Billion

Ford Weighted Average Shares Diluted is projected to increase significantly based on the last few years of reporting. The past year's Weighted Average Shares Diluted was at 4.03 Billion

Ford Workforce Comparison

Ford Motor is one of the top stocks in number of employees category among related companies. The total workforce of Auto Manufacturers industry is currently estimated at about 3.45 Million. Ford holds roughly 183,000 in number of employees claiming about 5% of stocks in Auto Manufacturers industry.

Ford Profit Margins

The company has Profit Margin of 8.59 %, which may indicate that it has good control over its costs or executes well on its competitive strategies. This is very large. Similarly, it shows Operating Margin of 10.97 %, which implies that for every $100 of sales, it generated an operating income of 0.11.

Ford Insider Trading

Some recent studies suggest that insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers and decreases overall economic growth. Trading by specific Ford insiders, such as employees or executives, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on Ford's material information that is not in the public domain. Local jurisdictions usually require such trading to be reported in order to monitor insider transactions. In many U.S. states, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade. In these cases, Ford insiders must file a Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when buying or selling shares of their own companies.

Ford Motor Benchmark Summation

The output start index for this execution was fourty-nine with a total number of output elements of twelve. The Lowest and highest values over a specified period plots line showing minimum and maximum value of Ford Motor price series.

Ford Notable Stakeholders

A Ford stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Ford often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Ford's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Ford's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
Mark Fields - CEO and President and DirectorProfile
James Hackett - President, Chief Executive Officer, DirectorProfile
Anning Chen - President and Chief Executive Officer of Ford of ChinaProfile
Joy Falotico - Group Vice President – Chairman and CEO, Ford Motor Credit Co.Profile
Bernard Silverstone - Group Vice President; Chairman and CEO of Ford Motor Credit Co.Profile
Jon Huntsman - Vice Chairman of the BoardProfile
William Ford - Executive Chairman, Chairman of Fin. Committee and Member of Sustainability and Innovation CommitteeProfile
Jeff Lemmer - Vice President COO - Information TechnologyProfile
Trevor Worthington - Vice President - Global Product Development Operations & Vehicle ProgramsProfile
Peter Fleet - Group Vice President and Presidentident - Asia PacificProfile
Bennie Fowler - Group Vice President - Quality and New model launchProfile
Kumar Galhotra - Group Vice President - Lincoln and Chief Marketing OfficerProfile
Ken Washington - CTO, Vice President - Research and Advanced EngineeringProfile
Cathy OCallaghan - Vice President ControllerProfile
John Casesa - Group Vice President – Global StrategyProfile
Ray Day - Group Vice President - CommunicationsProfile
Kimberly Pittel - Group Vice President - Sustainability, Environment and Safety EngineeringProfile
Steven Armstrong - Group Vice President and Presidentident - Europe, Middle East & AfricaProfile
David Schoch - Group Vice President and President Asia PacificProfile
Catherine OCallaghan - Vice President, Controller and Chief Financial Officer, Global MarketsProfile
Neil Schloss - Vice President CFO - MobilityProfile
Marcy Klevorn - Vice President CIOProfile
Bruce Hettle - Group Vice President – Manufacturing and Labor AffairsProfile
Mark LaNeve - Vice president - U.S. Marketing, Sales and ServiceProfile
Stuart Rowley - President of Ford of EuropeProfile
Musa Tariq - Vice President Chief Brand OfficerProfile
Sherif Marakby - Vice President - Autonomous Vehicles and ElectrificationProfile
Paul Ballew - Vice President and Chief Data and Analytics OfficerProfile
Mark Truby - Vice President - CommunicationsProfile
Ziad Ojakli - Group Vice President - Government and Community RelationsProfile
Stephen Odell - Executive Vice President and President Europe, Middle East and AfricaProfile
Mark Ovenden - Vice President - Marketing, Sales and Service, Asia PacificProfile
John Lawler - Chief Financial Officer, Vice PresidentProfile
Kenneth Kent - Vice President TreasurerProfile
Raj Nair - Group Vice President - Global Product DevelopmentProfile
Felicia Fields - Group Vice President - Human Resources and Corporate ServicesProfile
Kim Pittel - Group Vice President - Sustainability, Environment and Safety EngineeringProfile
Joseph Hinrichs - Executive VP and President of the AmericasProfile
James Farley - Executive VP and President of Europe, Middle East and AfricaProfile
John Fleming - Executive Vice President - Global Manufacturing and Labor AffairsProfile
Linda Cash - Vice President - Quality and New Model LaunchProfile
Timothy Stone - Chief Financial OfficerProfile
Robert Shanks - CFO and Executive VPProfile
Lynn Vojvodich - Independent DirectorProfile
James Hance - Independent DirectorProfile
John Weinberg - Independent DirectorProfile
Edsel Ford - DirectorProfile
Anthony Earley - Lead Independent DirectorProfile
Ellen Marram - Lead Independent DirectorProfile
John Thornton - Independent DirectorProfile
Gerald Shaheen - Independent DirectorProfile
John May - Independent DirectorProfile
John Lechleiter - Independent DirectorProfile
Beth Mooney - Independent DirectorProfile
John Veihmeyer - Independent DirectorProfile
Stephen Butler - Independent DirectorProfile
William Kennard - Independent DirectorProfile
William Helman - Independent DirectorProfile
Kimberly Casiano - Independent DirectorProfile
John Mellen - General CounselProfile
Bradley Gayton - Chief Administrative Officer, General CounselProfile
Alexandra English - Independent DirectorProfile
Doug Field - Chief Advanced Technology and Embedded Systems OfficerProfile
Ashwani Galhotra - President - Americas and International Markets GroupProfile
J Field - Chief Advanced Technology and Embedded Systems OfficerProfile
Henry Ford - Independent DirectorProfile
Christopher Smith - Chief Government Affairs OfficerProfile
Kiersten Robinson - Chief People and Employee Experience OfficerProfile
Lynn Radakovich - Independent DirectorProfile
Michael Amend - Chief Digital and Information OfficerProfile
Steven Croley - Chief Policy Officer and General CounselProfile
Hau ThaiTang - Chief Product Development and Purchasing OfficerProfile

About Ford Management Performance

The success or failure of an entity such as Ford Motor often depends on how effective the management is. Ford management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Ford management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Ford management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
Please read more on our stock advisor page.
Last ReportedProjected for 2022
Return on Investment 2.39  2.45 
Return on Average Assets 0.07  0.08 
Return on Average Equity 0.47  0.44 
Return on Invested Capital 0.07  0.07 
Return on Sales 0.14  0.15 
Ford Motor Company designs, manufactures, markets, and services a range of Ford trucks, cars, sport utility vehicles, electrified vehicles, and Lincoln luxury vehicles worldwide. Ford Motor Company was incorporated in 1903 and is based in Dearborn, Michigan. Ford operates under Auto Manufacturers classification in the United States and is traded on New York Stock Exchange. It employs 183000 people.
The data published in Ford's official financial statements usually reflect Ford's business processes, product offerings, services, and other fundamental events. But there are other numbers, ratios, or fundamental indicators derived from these statements that are easier to understand and visualize within the underlying realities that drive quantitative information of Ford Motor. For example, before you start analyzing numbers published by Ford accountants, it's critical to develop an understanding of what Ford's liquidity, profitability, and earnings quality are in the context of the Consumer Cyclical space in which it operates.
Please note, the presentation of Ford's financial position, as portrayed in its financial statements, is often influenced by management's estimates, judgments, and sometimes even manipulations. In the best case, Ford's management is honest, while the outside auditors are strict and uncompromising. Whatever the case, the imprecision that can be found in Ford's accounting process means that the reasonable investor should take a skeptical approach toward the financial statement analysis of Ford Motor. Please utilize our Beneish M Score to check the likelihood of Ford's management to manipulate its earnings.

Ford Workforce Analysis

Traditionally, organizations such as Ford use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Ford within its industry.

Ford Manpower Efficiency

Return on Ford Manpower

Revenue Per Employee841.6 K
Revenue Per Executive1.9 B
Net Income Per Employee105.8 K
Net Income Per Executive160.6 M
Today, most investors in Ford Stock are looking for potential investment opportunities by analyzing not only static indicators but also various Ford's growth ratios. Consistent increases or decreases in fundamental ratios usually indicate a possible pattern that can be successfully translated into profits. However, when comparing two companies, knowing each company's per employee growth rates may not be enough to decide which company is a better investment. That's why investors frequently use static breakdown of Ford per employee as a starting point in their analysis.

Per Employee

Ford Per Employee Growth Over Time

Net Income Per Employee


Ford Net Income Per Employee is projected to decrease significantly based on the last few years of reporting. The past year's Net Income Per Employee was at 98,016

Revenue Per Employee


Ford Revenue Per Employee is projected to decrease significantly based on the last few years of reporting. The past year's Revenue Per Employee was at 745,033
Please check Investing Opportunities. Note that the Ford Motor information on this page should be used as a complementary analysis to other Ford's statistical models used to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try ETF Directory module to find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world.

Complementary Tools for Ford Stock analysis

When running Ford Motor price analysis, check to measure Ford's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Ford is operating at the current time. Most of Ford's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Ford's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Ford's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Ford to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated
Stock Screener
Find equities using custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook.
Price Exposure Probability
Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets
Portfolio Diagnostics
Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings
Crypto Correlations
Use cryptocurrency correlation module to diversify your cryptocurrency portfolio across multiple coins
Probability Of Bankruptcy
Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years
Equity Search
Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets
Balance Of Power
Check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios
Price Ceiling Movement
Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments
Financial Widgets
Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets
Is Ford's industry expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Ford. If investors know Ford will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Ford listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth YOY
Market Capitalization
45.5 B
Quarterly Revenue Growth YOY
Return On Assets
Return On Equity
The market value of Ford Motor is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Ford that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Ford's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Ford's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Ford's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Ford's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Ford's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine Ford value by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Ford's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.