General Stock Executives


USD 220.96  2.29  1.05%   

General Dynamics employes about 100 K people. The company is managed by 44 executives with total tenure of roughly 311 years, averaging almost 7.0 years of service per executive having 2272.73 employees per reported executive. Evaluation of General Dynamics management performance can provide insight into the firm performance. Note, employee sentiment is becoming a valuable factor that investors use to determine the amount of risk that may be associated with General Dynamics Corp future performance.
Please check Risk vs Return Analysis.
  Phebe Novakovic  Chairman
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer
  Robert Smith  President
Executive Vice President - Marine Systems
  Mark Burns  President
Vice President, President of Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation

General Dynamics Management Team Effectiveness

General Dynamics Corp has Return on Asset (ROA) of 5.42 % which means that for every $100 of asset, it generated profit of $5.42. This is typical in the industry. Likewise, it shows return on total equity (ROE) of 20.23 %, which means that it produced $20.23 on every 100 dollars invested by current stockholders. General Dynamics management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well the company manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities.

General Dynamics Workforce Comparison

General Dynamics Corp is one of the top stocks in number of employees category among related companies. The total workforce of Aerospace & Defense industry is currently estimated at about 200,000. General Dynamics totals roughly 100,000 in number of employees claiming about 50% of stocks in Aerospace & Defense industry.

General Dynamics Profit Margins

The company has Net Profit Margin (PM) of 8.6 %, which may suggest that it has sound control over its expenditures, executes well on its competitive polices, or have a solid pricing strategies. This is very large. Likewise, it shows Net Operating Margin (NOM) of 13.73 %, which signifies that for every $100 of sales, it has a net operating income of 0.14.

General Dynamics Insider Trading

Some recent studies suggest that insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers and decreases overall economic growth. Trading by specific General Dynamics insiders, such as employees or executives, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on General Dynamics' material information that is not in the public domain. Local jurisdictions usually require such trading to be reported in order to monitor insider transactions. In many U.S. states, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade. In these cases, General Dynamics insiders must file a Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when buying or selling shares of their own companies.

General Dynamics Corp Benchmark Summation

The output start index for this execution was zero with a total number of output elements of sixty-one. General Dynamics Corp Price Series Division is a division of General Dynamics price series and its benchmark/peer.

General Dynamics Notable Stakeholders

A General Dynamics stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as General Dynamics often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. General Dynamics' stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting General Dynamics' stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
Phebe Novakovic - Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive OfficerProfile
Robert Smith - Executive Vice President - Marine SystemsProfile
Mark Burns - Vice President, President of Gulfstream Aerospace CorporationProfile
M Gilliland - Senior Vice President and President of General Dynamics Information TechnologyProfile
Mark Roualet - Executive Vice President - Combat SystemsProfile
SDaniel Johnson - Executive Vice President - Information Systems and TechnologyProfile
Kimberly Kuryea - Senior Vice President - Human Resources and AdministrationProfile
Dirk Lesko - Vice President - Corporation and Presidentident of General Dynamics Bath Iron WorksProfile
Jeffrey Geiger - Vice President and Presidentident - Electric BoatProfile
Jason Aiken - Senior Vice President, Chief Financial OfficerProfile
Christopher Brady - Vice President and Presidentident of General Dynamics Mission SystemsProfile
Robert Helm - Senior Vice President - Planning and DevelopmentProfile
Kevin Graney - Vice President of the Company and President of Electric Boat CorporationProfile
Firat Gezen - Vice President - Corporation and President of General DynamicsProfile
Gregory Gallopoulos - Senior Vice President, General Counsel, SecretaryProfile
Gary Whited - Vice President and Presidentident - General Dynamics Land SystemsProfile
Stephen Johnson - Executive Vice President - Information Systems and TechnologyProfile
Christopher Marzilli - Vice President; President of General Dynamics C4 Systems Inc.Profile
Amy Gilliland - Senior Vice President - Human Resources and AdministrationProfile
Daniel Johnson - Executive VP of Information Systems and Technology and President of General Dynamics Information TechnologyProfile
Howard Rubel - Vice President - Corporation and Vice President of Investor RelationsProfile
William Moss - Vice President ControllerProfile
John Casey - Executive VP of Marine Systems GroupProfile
Lester Lyles - Independent DirectorProfile
Mark Malcolm - Independent DirectorProfile
Robert Steel - Independent DirectorProfile
Erin Linnihan - Director - Investor RelationsProfile
Rudy Leon - Independent DirectorProfile
Catherine Reynolds - Independent DirectorProfile
Howard Nye - Independent DirectorProfile
Cecil Haney - Independent DirectorProfile
James Crown - Lead Independent DirectorProfile
John Keane - Independent DirectorProfile
Peter Wall - Independent DirectorProfile
William Fricks - Independent DirectorProfile
Nicholas Chabraja - DirectorProfile
John Stratton - Independent DirectorProfile
Mary Barra - Independent DirectorProfile
Laura Schumacher - Independent DirectorProfile
William Osborn - Independent DirectorProfile
James Mattis - Independent DirectorProfile
C Nye - Independent DirectorProfile
Danny Deep - Vice President and President of General Dynamics Land SystemsProfile
Rudy deleon - Independent DirectorProfile

About General Dynamics Management Performance

The success or failure of an entity such as General Dynamics Corp often depends on how effective the management is. General Dynamics management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of General management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the General management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
General Dynamics Corporation operates as an aerospace and defense company worldwide. General Dynamics Corporation was founded in 1899 and is headquartered in Reston, Virginia. General Dynamics operates under Aerospace Defense classification in the United States and is traded on New York Stock Exchange. It employs 100000 people.
The data published in General Dynamics' official financial statements usually reflect General Dynamics' business processes, product offerings, services, and other fundamental events. But there are other numbers, ratios, or fundamental indicators derived from these statements that are easier to understand and visualize within the underlying realities that drive quantitative information of General Dynamics Corp. For example, before you start analyzing numbers published by General accountants, it's critical to develop an understanding of what General Dynamics' liquidity, profitability, and earnings quality are in the context of the Industrials space in which it operates.
Please note, the presentation of General Dynamics' financial position, as portrayed in its financial statements, is often influenced by management's estimates, judgments, and sometimes even manipulations. In the best case, General Dynamics' management is honest, while the outside auditors are strict and uncompromising. Whatever the case, the imprecision that can be found in General Dynamics' accounting process means that the reasonable investor should take a skeptical approach toward the financial statement analysis of General Dynamics Corp. Please utilize our Beneish M Score to check the likelihood of General Dynamics' management to manipulate its earnings.

General Dynamics Workforce Analysis

Traditionally, organizations such as General Dynamics use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare General Dynamics within its industry.

General Dynamics Manpower Efficiency

Return on General Dynamics Manpower

Revenue Per Employee384.4 K
Revenue Per Executive873.6 M
Net Income Per Employee33.1 K
Net Income Per Executive75.2 M
Working Capital Per Employee21.3 K
Working Capital Per Executive48.3 M
Please check Risk vs Return Analysis. Note that the General Dynamics Corp information on this page should be used as a complementary analysis to other General Dynamics' statistical models used to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try Fundamentals Comparison module to compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities.

Complementary Tools for General Stock analysis

When running General Dynamics Corp price analysis, check to measure General Dynamics' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy General Dynamics is operating at the current time. Most of General Dynamics' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of General Dynamics' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and financial market as a whole to determine factors that move General Dynamics' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of General Dynamics to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
Pattern Recognition
Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges
Portfolio Optimization
Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk
Performance Analysis
Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation
Portfolio Anywhere
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Fundamentals Comparison
Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities
My Watchlist Analysis
Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like
Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated
Financial Widgets
Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets
Shere Portfolio
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Fundamental Analysis
View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements
Idea Analyzer
Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas
Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope
CEO Directory
Screen CEOs from public companies around the world
Is General Dynamics' industry expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of General Dynamics. If investors know General will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about General Dynamics listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
The market value of General Dynamics Corp is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of General that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of General Dynamics' value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is General Dynamics' true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because General Dynamics' market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect General Dynamics' underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between General Dynamics' value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine General Dynamics value by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, General Dynamics' price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.